04 June, 2012

Review: Canare L-2T2S and Sommer tricone MkII

Talk Cable: DIY Cables, a Must for any Audiophile
Review: Canare L-2T2S and Sommer tricone MkII interconnect cables

For the longest time, my reference interconnect cables have been the various Gotham cables, and that is unlikely to change at all. However, from time to time, I do try out a few other makes. Before I go into my recent forays, let me say why I think DIY cables is a necessity.

Why DIY Cables? Simple, "Audiophile" cables from audio manufacturers are mostly scams. The most balanced cables I have heard have all been no-frills professional cables. Unfortunately, most are sold as bare cables and termination is required.

Design your own cable? No. Some people assemble their own cables from core conductors and add shielding etc. In my experience, most of these sound unbalanced. There is much to choose from professional cables that self-assembly is a waste of time.

So when I say DIY, it is limited to termination. 十個名牌音響線九個不平衡;十個自作音響線九個不能聼。

RCA connectors I use cheap connectors. My own inclinations on RCA connectors: the connector must be rust-proof, light and made of THIN metal (such as the imitation "Canare" sold in HK). Many expensive boutique connectors, such as WBT, use chunky metal, but they look more impressive more than they sound good. Think about it, why would you want to use an expensive cable composed of many fine strands of conductors, then attach a huge metal chunk at the end to connect to a tiny female RCA connector (usually cheap even on expensive gears, and made from thin metal) on the machine?

Solder The solder must flow easily and quickly. Use sparingly, just enough to do the job and no more. I use standard stuff (I still have the older tinned ones, which I prefer). There are people out there who swear by difficult-to-manage silver and other expensive solder formulas, but I'd urge you not to get anal about it. The whole thing about solder that is like no solder (that is totally transparent) is nonsense. If you believe that, you might as well use solder-less screw-on connectors (but not WBT; use cheap ones, like the very light aluminum ones, the "brand" of which I forgot, available in HK).  

Which cable model? Most professional cable companies make a large number of models. Picking and choosing can be rather bewildering. My philosophy, if you can term it that, is to try out the cheapest model. With the reputable manufacturers, they never disappoint. You can then move up the price point if you wish, but I find the more expensive does not at all equate the better. More conductors, more complex configurations/geometries, more shielding etc may bring about better RF rejection or measurements, but sonically there is no guarantee.

A Note of Caution There are plenty of so-called cable experts out there, who terminate for you for a substantial fee. They claim perfect soldering etc. Some of these people may have the skills, but they also inflate their own significance. You can also develop them on your own to save yourself a lot of money. and have some fun on the way. 除了專業音響工程店外,十個所謂HiFi音響線專賣店十個黑;其它十個賣HiFi線的九個騙。

Illustrated Guide to DIY Cables This profusely illustrated site for how to terminate a cable is simply great. I just discovered it and am happy the author and I have much in common when it comes to cables.

And now brief reviews of two cables.
Canare L-2T2S (official info)
I have always liked Japanese Canare cables. The cables are soft to touch (a good sign) and sound musical. This is unlike Japanese Mogami, which tends to be much leaner. Japanese Softone/ICL equipment comes with cheap Canare cables that sound surprisingly good. This L-2T2S model is very cheap (HK $ 16/m), and available by the foot or in bulk (like here).

This cable has a fully fleshed out midrange and finely balanced sound. It has neither the ultimate attributes nor serious deficiencies. It matches perfectly my Thorens TD-309 turntable. A great starter cable. When I have time, I may compare it to Gotham GAC-2. People who find Mogami too lean can try this out. Who says there is only one "Japanese sound"?!

Sommer tricone MkII (official info)
I have never heard Gotham (old stock or current products) I don't like, but that is not the case for German Sommer. I have heard Sommer cables several times and in general they seem to be lacking somewhat in rhythm and pace. A friend even lent me the very expensive (around US $200) Epilogue. It is not a bad cable, revealing and balanced, but one expects a little more musicality, particularly at the price. The cheapest of the line, the tricone MkII, is no exception, but for the ridiculously low price (HK $12/m) its performance is very good indeed and there is much less to complain about. Overall, I still prefer the Canare L-2T2S.

FYI, I also got a bit of much more expensive Galileo 238 plus (HK $38/m) to try, and shall report later. I am not the only one who suspects the cheaper Sommer models sound better than the more expensive ones.

Incidentally, I noticed that the word "highflex" on my tricone is in italics, whereas that on the website picture is not. I called 雅歌 and was informed that Sommer sometimes changes things without notice.

Where to get Canare and Sommer in HK
Most HK audiophiles get their Sommer and Canare from Apliu street, particularly 雅歌. The staff is very friendly, honest and helpful. They won't recommend anything unless you want them to; no hard sell here. Here are their details:


Acoustic Engineering Co Ltd 雅歌工程有限公司
G/F., 66 Yen Chow St., Sham Shui Po
Telephone: 2729 1022
Fax: 2725 6787
E-mail: acoustic01@biznetvigator.com

However, 雅歌 is only the retailer who gets their supplies from the distributor. For Sommer at least, 雅歌 gets their supply from Palonn 柏龍, who is listed in Sommer's official website as a Hong Kong distributor, although the same website also lists another two dealers for China, and both have HK addresses (one even has a "sommer hk" website). So, it is a little complicated. But unless you plan to buy a roll, Apliu Street and 雅歌 is still your best choice.

13 comments:

  1. Nice review, I enjoying your review very much

    ReplyDelete
  2. After reading your article I ordered a pair of Canare L-2T2S (3ft) a pair and Gotham GAC-2 (3ft) interconnect cables with Canare F9 RCA plugs from Redco. I gave them over 200 hrs of brake-in time. This is is my observation.
    Sound stage of the Gotham is wider but may not be as deep as the Canare cable
    The speakers disappear with the Gotham cable vs Canare where it's not and the sound-stage doesn't extent beyond the speakers position.
    Instrumental outlines are more noticeable with better middle image with the Gotham.
    More detail and more micro dynamics with the Gotham
    Richer/lush sound with the Gotham that can make lesser recordings sound involving.
    Lack of upper mid-range peak/sibilant with the the Gotham that could make saxophone sound sibilant with the Canare
    Overall the Canare is nice cable and a good starter cable but Gotham is higher performing cable.
    Thanks for the recommendations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the feedback! Much appreciated, and your views coincide with mine. Since u like Gotham, try out their GAC-4 and perhaps also GAC-1 Ultra Pro.

      Delete
    2. I may try the GAC-4 but based on your reviews it seems the only difference is the top end having a little more air but nothing else.

      Delete
    3. I also read in other forums that the GAC-4 may sound bright in some systems vs the GAC-2? I also recommend an Interesting article from a philosophy professor from Brown University abut his experience with Gotham cables. It's in PDF download link. Search "Gotham Cable and Me"

      Delete
    4. Thank you so much for that pdf referral. I just read it and it was great. I really think one has to determine for oneself which one is the best. Do try the GAC4/1 and the GAC-1 Ultra Pro. The latter is the only one in the Ultra Pro series that I have tried, as it is cheaper. Many HK audiophiles favor GAC-4 Ultra Pro but I don't like its bulk as I have a natural aversion to thick cables. The EMT replica GAC-2111 is maddening to terminate but good. One of my favorites though is the cheapo DRG-1, darker but coherent. All written up in the blog. Have a good one. If you have further experience, post it somewhere here. Many thanks for the feedbacks.

      Delete
    5. You're welcome! I forgot to mention that I did try Gotham GAC-4/1 Interconnect Cable with Amphenol ACPR Die-Cast, Gold Plated RCA Connectors - Directional from WBC on Amazon. Even after the proper break-in time they sounded bright. Unlistenable to me. Maybe the floating grounding or the RCA connectors were the culprit? Redco makes my cables non-directional and I have them using Canare RCA connectors and maybe that does the trick? Maybe I will order a GAC-4 from them and hope they will be better sounding.

      Delete
    6. This is not surprising as every system is different. I say forget it and just stay with the GAC-2. If there's a way, try the GAC-1 Ultra Pro but likely you shall find it bright also.

      Delete
    7. This quote by Klaus Heyne the recording engineer guru made me interested in the GAC-3. “I have extensively tested all of Gotham's two/three/four-conductor interconnect material. None compares in frequency balance and resolution to the GAC3. However, they have recently come out with a very good, rather thick, purplelish cable, the GAC-4 Pro, whose slightly more robust lows, compared to the GAC 3, I really like; this cable should not to be confused with the GAC 2 Pro, which underperformed the GAC3, in my opinion.”

      Delete
    8. Again, many thanks for an informative update. In fact, should you re-visit here, would you email me? doctorjohn@myself.com Thx.

      Delete
    9. I'm auditioning the GAC-3. Vintage Brown (thicker jacket version) with Neutrik NC3XX-B series xlr’s. $50 US for a pair on Ebay! From the start, it sounded superior to the GAC-4 XLR with the same connectors that I had in my system. The hardness in the upper midrange is now gone. Saxophones now sound pleasant. The sound is more lush and full and enjoyable. I haven't had luck with GAC-4 in my system. Even the GAC-2 sounded superior overall in my system even though the highs were inferior to the GAC-4. Lesson learned: It's not about the material and the insulation stupid but the engineering. Material is a distant 2nd on the priority list. PVC insulation kicks ass as far my hearings concerned, even if it's inferior to PE insulation. This was an eye-opening experience. The engineer behind the GAC -3 deserves to be known among audiophiles.

      Delete
    10. Thx again for the continual info! Again, could you email me? doctorjohn@myself.com

      Delete
    11. I had some time to continue comparing the GAC-3 XLR to both GAC-2 XLR and GAC-4 XLR. Finally, I can honestly say that the GAC-3 is the best sounding cable I had in my system. The GAC-2 and GAC4 sounds slightly more dynamic, however, have less resolution and could sound slightly edgy/sharp in the midrange in comparison. I replaced my Gotham power cable with an unshielded Soundstring power cord, and that did the trick, and my system sounds dynamic with the GAC-3. Gotham power cord works very well with my DAC, but not with my amp. Makes it soft sounding and robs some of its dynamics and maybe even some details. The GAC -3 has a (maybe lush?) balanced sound with a deeper sound stage depth and better timbre and more to hear, more to enjoy. It's a 40 years old cable with only PVC insulation. Go figure.

      Delete